Juan Antonio Madrazo Luna
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2018-025-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2018
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 21.521757
Longitude: -77.781167
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Cuba
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- Assistant Secretary-General
- Dates of prior UN action
- 11 April 2018
- Type of record
- Named individual
- Gender
- Male
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
members of the Comité Ciudadanos por la Integración Racial (CIR)
- Type of rights defended
- Caste/Ethnic minorities' rights/Racism
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
planned to participate in pre-meetings related to the universal periodic review
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Human Rights Council: UN Human Rights Council - General
- UN Human Rights Council: UPR
- Dates of engagement
- 12 May 2018
- Type of attempted engagement
- Participation in meeting on UN premises
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- 07 April 2018; 12 May 2018
- Location of mentioned reprisals
- Havana
- Reprisal information
subject to intense scrutiny at the airport by customs and immigration officials, and were prevented from being able to board the plane to travel to Geneva.
intercepted at Havana airport and detained by the police for two hours for a “verification of (his) documents” which ensured he missed his flight to Geneva (via Madrid)
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Family/friends/acquaintances targeted
- Detention/Imprisonment: Release within a day
- Travel restriction
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- Yes
- Government response dates
- 10 May 2018
- Government response content
the Government responded that the individuals mentioned in the letter do not merit the categorization of ‘human rights defender’ because of the large monetary sums received for their work from undue foreign influence intent on regime change. The Government stated that these individuals should be more appropriately called ‘foreign agents,’ and rejected categorically the allegations of reprisals.
- Was the case raised by a State at the UN?
- Yes
- Which State raised the case at the UN and when?
In June 2019, BENELUX raised the case at the 41st session of the Human Rights Council under item 5: 'We would like to draw your attention on specific allegations of intimidation and reprisals that have been reported in a recent past and which are a source of concern for our countries. It relates notably to NGO representatives who contributed to the UPR process, such as among others Dora Mesa, Executive Director of ACDEI and Juan Antonio Madrazo Luna Coordinator of the CIR in Cuba.'
On 3 July 2019, a group of Member States in the Human Rights Council drew attention to his case.
In March 2021, BENELUX raised the case again at the 46th session of the Human Rights Council under item 5: 'We would like to follow up on unresolved cases related to HRC engagement previously raised in our statements in 2019 and 2020. These include: • Dora Mesa; and Juan Antonio Madrazo Luna from Cuba.'
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 4
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 0
- 2019
- Follow up information provided in SG report 0
The case of Mr. Juan Antonio Madrazo Luna, member of the Comité Ciudadanos por la Integración Racial (CIR), was included in the 2018 report of the Secretary-General (A/HRC/39/41, Annex I, para. 25) due to travel restrictions that prevented him from travelling to Geneva to attend the UPR session. According to new information received, in August 2018, Mr. Madrazo Luna was the subject of a 21-day travel ban preventing him from participating in the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination review of Cuba. On 30 August 2018, the Committee sent a letter to the State party addressing these allegations and requesting a response with information on measures taken to prevent and address reprisals against those who cooperate with the UN. On 15 October 2018, the Government responded to the Committee. 37. Reports received indicate that, in December 2018 and January 2019, Mr. Madrazo Luna and members of CIR were subject to a number of police operations preventing them from carrying out different events, including the celebration of Human Rights Day and presentation of CERD’s observations. On 21 January 2019, Mr. Madrazo Lunas was arrested and held in a police station for eight hours.
- Followup Trends 0
- Deterioration/further reprisals
- Did the government respond? 0
- Yes
- Was this case followed up by a UN body? 0
- UN Treaty Bodies: CERD
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 1
- 2020
- Follow up information provided in SG report 1
The situation of Mr. Juan Antonio Madrazo Luna, member of the Comité Ciudadanos por la Integración Racial (CIR), was included in the 2019 and 2018 (A/HRC/42/30, Annex II, paras. 36–37; A/HRC/39/41, Annex I, para. 25) reports of the Secretary-General on allegations of travel restrictions that prevented his engagement with CERD and the UPR session in 2018. On 3 July 2019, a group of Member States in the Human Rights Council drew attention to his case. 31 Between 30 September and 3 October 2019, Mr. Madrazo Luna travelled to Geneva where he met with representatives of OHCHR, civil society and diplomatic missions and participated in a public event, broadcast live on social media. He returned to Cuba and on 27 October 2019, was reportedly subject to a travel ban at Havana airport when attempting to again leave Cuba. Authorities informed him that he had no permission to leave the country, but did not provide a reason for the decision. 41. On 19 August 2020, the Government responded to the note verbale in connection to the present report stating that the allegations are not only unfounded but are based on fabricated testimonies with motivations outside the cause of human rights. The Government rejected as false the allegations that restrictions or prohibitions on departure from the country apply to Mr. Madrazo Luna and Mr. Morales Estrada. On the contrary, the immigration records show many trips abroad of both individuals during the past few years some of them for participating in international events and meetings in different countries. The allegations of harassment after their return to the national territory from Spain in October 2019 are also false as are the allegations of alleged subpoenas to police units and intimidation by the customs authorities.
- Followup Trends 1
- Deterioration/further reprisals
- Date of follow up 1
- 3 July 2019
- Did the government respond? 1
- Yes
- Was this case followed up by a UN body? 1
- UN Special Procedures: UN Special Procedures - General
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 2
- 2021
- Follow up information provided in SG report 2
The case of Mr. Juan Antonio Madrazo Luna, member of the Comité Ciudadanos por la Integración Racial (CIR), was included in the 2020, 2019 and 2018 reports of the Secretary-General138 on allegations of travel restrictions that prevented his engagement with the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) and the UPR session in 2018. The case of Ms. Marthadela Tamayo González, member of CIR, was included in the 2018 report of the Secretary-General for the same reasons.139 On 18 January 2021, special procedures mandate holders addressed allegations of surveillance, threats, travel bans, and alleged arbitrary detentions on a regular basis since 2017 against several members of the CIR, including Mr. Madrazo Luna and Ms. Tamayo González (CUB 1/2021).
- Incidents in October and November 2020 have reportedly included searches at the place of residence of Mr. Madrazo Luna with a warrant from the Public Prosecutor’s Office, confiscation of equipment and documents linked to his work, and questioning and threats by police officers. They also included the arrest of Ms. Tamayo Gonzalez on the eve of a public event on racial discrimination which prevented her from participating (CUB 1/2021). On 11 March 2021, mandate holders publicly addressed the situation of CIR and its members, including travel restrictions. 140 On 3 and 16 March 2021, the Government responded, regretting that UN human rights mechanisms are used to channel and validate false allegations. It indicated that there are no complaints on alleged threats and intimidation by state agents against Mr. Madrazo Luna and Ms. Marthadela Tamayo, questioned the “misuse of the term human rights defenders” and provided information on trips by both of them outside the country between 2013 and 2019.141
- Followup Trends 2
- Deterioration/further reprisals
- Date of follow up 2
- 18 January 2021, 11 March 2021,
- Did the government respond? 2
- Yes
- Was this case followed up by a UN body? 2
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- UN Special Procedures: UN Special Procedures - General
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 3
- 2022
- Follow up information provided in SG report 3
- The case of Mr. Juan Antonio Madrazo Luna, member of the Comité Ciudadanos por la Integración Racial (CIR), was included in the 2019, 2020 and 2021 reports of the Secretary-General on allegations of travel restrictions that prevented his engagement with the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and the Universal Periodic Review session in 2018. The case of Ms. Marthadela Tamayo González, member of CIR working on women’s rights, was included in the 2018 and 2021 reports of the Secretary-General for the same reasons. According to information received by OHCHR, both Mr. Madrazo Luna and Ms. Tamayo González have continued to suffer intimidation and harassment by the police during the reporting period. They have reportedly been under constant surveillance by police agents during the period. In addition, both were arbitrarily arrested several times during the reporting period, interrogated and deprived of their liberty for a few hours each time. It is reported that other members of the CIR have also been intimated by the police and asked to warn Ms. Tamayo Gonzalez to discontinue her human right work referring to her engagement with the United Nations, and to inform Mr. Madrazo Luna that he will not be allowed to travel abroad.
- Followup Trends 3
- Deterioration/further reprisals
- Did the government respond? 3
- Yes
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 4
- 2023
- Follow up information provided in SG report 4
- The case of Mr. Juan Antonio Madrazo Luna, a member of the Comité Ciudadanos por la Integración Racial (CIR), has been included since 2019 in the reports of the SecretaryGeneral on allegations of intimidation and travel restrictions that prevented his engagement with the Universal Periodic Review of Cuba and Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination62 in 2018. The Committee addressed the allegations in August 2018 and the Government responded. The case of Ms. Marthadela Tamayo González, a member of CIR working on women’s rights, was included in the 2018, 2021 and 2022 reports of the Secretary-General on allegations of intimidation and travel restrictions in connection to her engagement with the Universal Periodic Review of Cuba in 2018. Special procedures mandate holders have addressed the situation of Mr. Madrazo Luna and Ms. Tamayo Gonzalez in two communications64 to which the Government has responded.65
- According to information received by OHCHR, Mr. Madrazo Luna and Ms. Tamayo González were informed by the authorities that they continue to be under a temporary exit ban (regulados) during the reporting period and could not travel abroad. This reportedly hindered their engagement with the United Nations, including for the ongoing preparations of the fourth cycle of the Universal Periodic Review of Cuba, scheduled to take place in November 2023. Both human rights defenders reportedly continue to be under constant surveillance at their home by police agents and have suffered repeated and targeted interruptions of their mobile data and landline phone services, sometimes for periods of weeks. This has prevented them from seeking, receiving, and imparting information, and obstructed their engagement with the United Nations.
- Followup Trends 4
- Deterioration/further reprisals
- Did the government respond? 4
- No