Ti-Anna Wang
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2014-020-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2014
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 35.86166
Longitude: 104.195397
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- China
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- Type of record
- Named individual
- Gender
- Female
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
daughter of Wang Bingzhang, founder of the overseas Chinese Democratic Movement and imprisoned since July 2002,
- Type of rights defended
- Civil/political rights
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
testified under agenda item 4 of the twenty-fifth session of the Human Rights Council on the situation of human rights in China in general, and on the detention of her father specifically.
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Human Rights Council: UN Human Rights Council - General
- Dates of engagement
- 18 March 2014
- Type of attempted engagement
- Participation in meeting on UN premises
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- 19 March 2014
- Reprisal information
prior to the scheduled adoption of the second universal periodic review report of China, an individual wearing a badge of the China Association for Preservation and Development of Tibetan Culture took photographs of Ms. Wang, her computer screen and belongings. United Nations security officers escorted the individual from the room where the Council session was taking place. The individual’s ground pass was subsequently withheld for the rest of the session.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Surveillance
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- Unclear
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 0