civil society actors, human rights defenders, whistle-blowers, and scientists
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2024-052-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2024
- From Country
- France
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 46.227638
Longitude: 2.213749
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- France
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- Dates of prior UN action
- 20 March 2024, 28 March 2024
- Type of record
- General situation addressed
- Type of rights defended
- Economic/social rights
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
Academic visit of SR on water and sanitation
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Special Procedures: thematic
- Dates of engagement
- 27-29 November 2023
- Type of attempted engagement
- Meeting with UN officials during country visit / with locally present UN officials
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- 27-29 November 2023
- Location of mentioned reprisals
- Guadeloupe
- Reprisal information
- On 24 January 2024, special procedures mandate holders addressed issues related to the enjoyment of the rights to safe drinking water and sanitation in the French overseas department of Guadeloupe, including allegations of intimidation and pressure against civil society actors in connection with the academic visit of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation to Guadeloupe from 27 to 29 November 2023 (FRA 1/2024). Names and details of those concerned are withheld for fear of further reprisals.
- Mandate holders expressed concern at reports received of censorship to silence critical voices during this academic visit of the Special Rapporteur, including of human rights defenders, whistle-blowers, and scientists. They referred to the last-minute cancelation of a lecture the Special Rapporteur had been invited to deliver on 29 November 2023 at the Antilles University due to alleged pressure “at the highest level.” Some individuals reportedly feared losing their jobs if they collaborated with the Special Rapporteur (FRA 1/2024). On 28 March 2024, mandate holders expressed concerns publicly 16 that civil society organisations, human rights defenders and other actors who had been active on the rights to safe drinking water in Guadeloupe had been put under pressure and intimidated
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Threats/Intimidations (incl. "fear of reprisal")
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Government response dates
- 25 March 2024, 20 June 2024
- Government response content
On 25 March 2024, the Government responded to mandate holders addressing the questions put forward, including the allegations of reprisals in relation to the academic visit of the Special Rapporteur. The Government noted that the Special Rapporteur had informed the country about his plans to visit Guadeloupe, that it was not an official visit and that he had been invited by the Antilles University. It further noted that he had been able to meet with relevant local authorities and services about the problems related to water in Guadeloupe. In relation to the cancellation of the lecture, the Government stated that it seemed that the university had not been informed by the organizers of the holding of this lecture, which compromised its organisation on the premises. The Government stated that it attached great importance to the work of Special Procedures, and it would continue to cooperate with them and defend their independence. It noted that it had not exerted any pressure in this matter. 55. On 20 June 2024, the Government responded to the note verbale sent in connection to the present report and provided editorial comments to the summary of its reply to the mandate-holders, some of which were incorporated in the report.
- Was the case raised by a State at the UN?
- No
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- Yes