General situation addressed
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2020-097-002
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2020
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 12.879721
Longitude: 121.774017
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Philippines
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- UN (Dep.) High Commissioner on Human Rights
- Dates of prior UN action
- June 2019
- Type of record
- General situation addressed
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Engagement with UN body
- Unclear
- Type of attempted engagement
- Unclear
- Reprisal information
stated that, for decades now, “red-tagging” or labelling individuals and groups as communists or terrorists has been a persistent and powerful threat to civil society and freedom of expression
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Defamation / Defamation campaign
- Threats/Intimidations (incl. "fear of reprisal")
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Government response dates
- 23 July 2020
- Government response content
Government responded in detail to the note verbale in connection to the present report, drawing attention to the vibrant civil society in the country which is exploited by terrorist organizations purporting to be “human rights defenders”, who are able to access funding to serve violent agendas in communities on the ground. Regarding the alleged “red-tagging” of organizations as terrorist or communist, the Government stressed that OHCHR’s data gathering and analysis methodology needs to be more transparent and take into account the local political context. It noted that the long history of the Communist Party of the Philippines-New People’s Army-National Democratic Front (CPP-NPA-NDF)’s exploitation and instrumentalization of human rights spaces is well-known and documented.
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 0