Anyone cooperating with the CoI (alleged victims, experts on the situation in the DPRK, aid workers, journalists and diplomats)
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2014-022-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2014
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 40.339852
Longitude: 127.510093
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Korea, North
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- UN Human Rights Council: UN Independent Investigation
- Dates of prior UN action
- 16 September 2013
- Type of record
- Unnamed individual/group/organization
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
The work of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was hampered as a result of fear of reprisals against anyone cooperating with the Commission, or their relatives still residing in the country.
- Type of rights defended
- Unclear in SG Report
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
Cooperation with Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Human Rights Council: UN Independent Investigation
- Dates of engagement
- Unclear
- Type of attempted engagement
- Unclear
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- Unclear
- Reprisal information
The work of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was hampered as a result of fear of reprisals against anyone cooperating with the Commission, or their relatives still residing in the country. The fear of reprisals was experienced by alleged victims, experts on the situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, aid workers, journalists and diplomats. As a result, the Commission heard publicly only from alleged victims and witnesses who had no close family left in the country and were otherwise deemed not to be at too high a risk.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Defamation / Defamation campaign
- Threats/Intimidations (incl. "fear of reprisal")
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 0