human rights defenders
Cases- Case status
- Unknown
- Location of case in SG report
- 2021-111-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2021
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 23.424076
Longitude: 53.847818
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- United Arab Emirates
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- Dates of prior UN action
- November 2020
- Type of record
- General situation addressed
- Individual's/organization's activity
human rights defenders, including those facing reprisals for having cooperated with the UN. many cases brought before the Working Group in recent years concerning arbitrary detention in the United Arab Emirates.
- Type of rights defended
- Civil/political rights
- Unclear in SG Report
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
cooperating/attempting to cooperate with the UN
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Special Procedures: thematic
- Unclear
- Type of attempted engagement
- Other
- Submission of information to UN
- Reprisal information
Multiple special procedures mandate holders raised alarm during the reporting period about arbitrary detention, long prison sentences and the use of counter-terrorism legislation to justify the targeting of human rights defenders, including those facing reprisals for having cooperated with the UN.68 In November 2020, during its eighty-ninth session, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, in reviewing the situations of two women who had allegedly suffered reprisals for engaging with the UN (see Annex II), noted that they were among the “many cases brought before the Working Group in recent years concerning arbitrary detention in the United Arab Emirates,” and that “this pattern indicates a systemic problem”. 112. In November 2020, mandate holders provided comments on the 2014 Law No. 7 On Combatting Terrorism Offences (Law 7), noting that the law’s overly broad definitions of terrorist organizations may curtail the legitimate work of human rights defenders, including their ability to engage in international fora (OL ARE 6/2020).69
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Detention/Imprisonment: Detention/Imprisonment - General
- Threats/Intimidations (incl. "fear of reprisal")
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- Yes
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Was the case raised by a State at the UN?
- No
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- Yes
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 0