A/HRC/30/29 Government had not responded to the earlier communication dated 16 April 2014 and stated that he was still awaiting a detailed response from the Government to the allegations and questions raised (A/HRC/28/63/Add.1, paras. 554 -555). 6. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 7. The case of Judge Maria Lourdes Afiuni Mora has been raised in each of my previous reports since 2010 (A/HRC/14/19, para. 45-47, A/HRC/18/19, para. 87-90, A/HRC/21/28, para. 68-69, A/HRC/24/29, para. 46-48 and A/HRC/27/38, para. 46). The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention in its latest report again expressed its concern over the continued detention under house arrest of Ms. Afiuni, which it considers as a measure of reprisal against her for ordering the conditional release of Mr. Eligio Cedeño after the WGAD in Opinion No. 10/2009 had considered his detention arbitrary (A/HRC/30/36, para. 38). The Working Group reiterated its call on the Government of Venezuela to release Ms. Afiuni and to provide her with effective and adequate reparations (ibid.). In its concluding observations on the combined third and fourth periodic reports of Venezuela, CAT regretted that no investigation had so far been opened on the case of Judge Afiuni and stated that the Government should without delay conduct a thorough and impartial investigation into the allegations of torture and ill-treatment, including sexual assault, of Ms. Afiuni during her detention (CAT/C/VEN/CO/3-4, para. 16). GE.15-13885 21/21