Some professionals in the cultural field
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2020-101-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2020
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 51.919438
Longitude: 19.145136
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Poland
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- Dates of prior UN action
- 4 March 2020
- Type of record
- Unnamed individual/group/organization
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
some professionals in the cultural field were beginning to engage in self-censorship to protect themselves and their institutions; In her response, the Special Rapporteur stated that mandate holders “often do not disclose the names of the sources of their information, particularly when people fear reprisals” and that “in the cultural sector in Poland there was some fear of being seen talking to me because of fear of reprisals.” 73 She named, for example, reprisals with regard to employment in the cultural sector or being able to receive funding.
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Special Procedures: thematic
- Dates of engagement
- from 24 September to 5 October 2018
- Type of attempted engagement
- Meeting with UN officials during country visit / with locally present UN officials
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- Unclear
- Reprisal information
some professionals in the cultural field were beginning to engage in self-censorship to protect themselves and their institutions; In her response, the Special Rapporteur stated that mandate holders “often do not disclose the names of the sources of their information, particularly when people fear reprisals” and that “in the cultural sector in Poland there was some fear of being seen talking to me because of fear of reprisals.” 73 She named, for example, reprisals with regard to employment in the cultural sector or being able to receive funding.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Threats/Intimidations (incl. "fear of reprisal")
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- Unclear
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Government response content
The Government of Poland at the Human Rights Council regretted that the report’s conclusions had been drawn based on “one-sided statements by unspecified interlocutors, unsupported by any concrete evidence.”
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- Yes
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 0