Dolkun Isa
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2017-025-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2017
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 35.86166
Longitude: 104.195397
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- China
- From Region
- Type of record
- Named individual
- Gender
- Male
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
Uyghur human rights activist and member of the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization.
- Type of rights defended
- Caste/Ethnic minorities' rights/Racism
- Was the victim a civil servant, member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
Attending the annual Permanent Forum on Indigenous Peoples at United Nations Headquarters
- Engagement with UN body
- UN General Assembly: Forum on indigenous issues
- Dates of engagement
- 26 April 2017
- Type of attempted engagement
- Participation in meeting on UN premises
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- 26 April 2017
- Reprisal information
Escorted from the UN premises pending further examination following the receipt of information from representatives of China alleging “security reasons”. As a result, Mr. Isa was unable to resume his participation in the Forum.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Access to UN premises denied
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 2
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 0
- 2019
- Follow up information provided in SG report 0
The case of Mr. Dolkun Isa was included in the 2017 report of the Secretary-General (A/HRC/36/31, para. 29), in the context of his participation in the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Peoples in New York. On 28 July 2018, six special procedures mandated holders expressed serious concern regarding attempts by the Government to prevent Mr. Isa from participating in United Nations fora, which they stated may aim to “prevent the sharing of information with United Nations human rights bodies about the human rights situation of the Uyghur minority in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China” (CHN 13/2018). 127 [...] 32. Concerning the case of Mr. Dolkun Isa, the Government indicated that he is a designated terrorist by the Chinese Government, seriously threatening national security and spreading international terrorist activities. The World Uyghur Congress of which he is chairman has incited the “East Turkistan Islamist movement” to carry out violent and extremist activities in the Xinjiang region and has arranged for individuals in China to travel abroad illegally to Syria and elsewhere to join the “jihad.” It is the view of the Government that he, in the guise of “human rights” and “ethnic independence,” incited extremism and hatred and engaged in separatist activities, undermining China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, which is against the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
- Followup Trends 0
- Deterioration/further reprisals
- Did the government respond? 0
- Yes
- Was this case followed up by a UN body? 0
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 1
- 2020
- Follow up information provided in SG report 1
The case of Mr. Dolkun Isa was included in the 2019 and 2017 reports of the Secretary-General (A/HRC/42/30, para. 46 and Annex II, paras. 27, 32; A/HRC/36/31, para. 29) on allegations of attempts by the Government to prevent his participation in UN fora (CHN 13/2018). 29 It was reported to OHCHR that during the reporting period additional attempts were made to prevent the participation of Mr. Dolkun Isa in UN fora, including sessions of the Human Rights Council in Geneva.
- Followup Trends 1
- Deterioration/further reprisals
- Did the government respond? 1
- No