Human rights defenders, journalists, lawyers and activists
Cases- Case status
- Unknown
- Location of case in SG report
- 2021-130-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2021
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 15.552727
Longitude: 48.516388
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Yemen
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- UN Human Rights Council: UN Independent Investigation
- Dates of prior UN action
- September 2020
- Type of record
- General situation addressed
- Type of rights defended
- Accountability & impunity
- Unclear in SG Report
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
engaging with their investigators and sharing information
workshops and activities in areas under Houthi control.
engage with the UN, cooperate with OHCHR’s remote investigations.
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Human Rights Council: UN Independent Investigation
- Type of attempted engagement
- Submission of information to UN
- Location of mentioned reprisals
- Yemen
- Reprisal information
In September 2020, the Group of Eminent International and Regional Experts on Yemen (GEE) expressed regret that, for a second year, it was not able to access Yemen (A/HRC/45/6 paras. 7–8). The GEE also expressed continued “concern over the climate of fear in Yemen, which deters victims, witnesses and organizations from engaging with their investigators and sharing information” (para. 8), and noted that it had documented violations which “continued to target human rights defenders, journalists, lawyers and activists to repress dissent and curtail criticism” (para. 80). 131. OHCHR documented government restrictions on humanitarian and development activity which inhibited UN operations. Following the 6 November 2019 decree (No. 201) issued by the Houthis (who also call themselves Ansar Allah) establishing the Supreme Council for Management and Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and International Cooperation (SCMCHA), local authorities have regularly limited access for OHCHR staff during human rights investigations. Despite the cooperation agreement with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates, OHCHR has been required to seek approval for travel between governorates and to access IDP camps managed by SCMCHA, as well as to conduct workshops and activities in areas under Houthi control. 132. Further, on 10 January 2021 the Houthis published a statement determining that local civil society organizations must not conduct online activities, events, research or communication without prior approval of the SCMCHA. As a result, many civil society actors are reportedly reluctant to engage with the UN, and on several occasions have declined to cooperate with OHCHR’s remote investigations.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Access denied to UN expert/representative
- Threats/Intimidations (incl. "fear of reprisal")
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- Yes
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- Yes
- Was the case raised by a State at the UN?
- No
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- Yes
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 0