Cao Shunli
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2014-017-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2014
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 35.86166
Longitude: 104.195397
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- China
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- Dates of prior UN action
- From mid-July 2013 onward; 4 March 2014
- Type of record
- Named individual
- Gender
- Female
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
prominent Chinese human rights lawyer who had been campaigning for transparency and greater participation of civil society in the universal periodic review of China
- Type of rights defended
- Civil/political rights
- Was the victim a civil servant, member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
Since December 2008, a group of human rights activists, including Ms. Cao, Chen Jianfang and Peng Lanlan, had been requesting the Chinese authorities to allow their participation in the preparation of the national report of China for its first and later its second universal periodic review.
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Human Rights Council: UPR
- Dates of engagement
- Since December 2008; September 2013
- Type of attempted engagement
- Other
- Participation in meeting on UN premises
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- 14 September 2013; 14 March 2014
- Reprisal information
Since December 2008, a group of human rights activists, including Ms. Cao, Chen Jianfang and Peng Lanlan, had been requesting the Chinese authorities to allow their participation in the preparation of the national report of China for its first and later its second universal periodic review. On 14 September 2013, while boarding a flight to Geneva to attend a training session on United Nations human rights mechanisms, Ms. Cao was reportedly stopped and transferred to an unknown location by security agents.
On 21 October 2013, five weeks after she was first taken into custody and one day before the consideration of China by the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, the authorities confirmed that Ms. Cao had been detained at Chaoyang District Detention Centre. Ms. Cao’s health deteriorated progressively. Medication for her liver condition was reportedly taken away and a medical examination, conducted at the request of her lawyer on 18 November 2013, confirmed that she had tuberculosis in her lungs, liver effusion and uterine myomas and cysts. Her lawyer applied for medical parole several times, which was reportedly orally denied by officials of the detention centre. Ms. Cao died on 14 March 2014.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Detention/Imprisonment: Death in custody
- Disappearance/Kidnapping
- Physical attack: Torture/Cruel, inhuman, degrading treatment
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Government response content
Government of China had replied to three communications, sent on 23 September 2013, 7 January 2014 and 24 January 2014 respectively, indicating that careful investigations into those cases had shown that the information contained in the communications was not consistent with the facts
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 5
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 0
- 2015
- Follow up information provided in SG report 0
1.In my previous report,reference was made to Cao Shunli, who had been campaigning for transparency and greater participation of civil society in the universal periodic review processof Chinaand reportedly as a result was arrested, detained and denied medical treatment resulting in her death on 14 March 2014(A/HRC/27/38, paras. 17-19). In hisreport of 10 June 2015, the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association regretted not having received a response from the Government to the joint communication sent on 4 March 2014(A/HRC/29/25/Add.3, paras.240-244). The Rapporteur reiterated his utmost concern that the death of Ms. Cao might have been a reprisal for her continued cooperation with the United Nations in the field of human rights and urged the authorities to inform him of the results of the investigations of the circumstances leading to Ms. Cao’s death, as soon as possible(ibid.). At the time of finalization of the present report, no response had been received from the Government
- Followup Trends 0
- Stayed same
- Did the government respond? 0
- No
- Was this case followed up by a UN body? 0
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 1
- 2016
- Follow up information provided in SG report 1
The case of Cao Shunli was included in my previous two reports (see A/HRC/27/38, paras. 17-19, and A/HRC/30/29, annex, para. 1). Ms. Cao had actively campaigned for transparency and greater participation of civil society in the universal periodic review process of China and was, reportedly as a result thereof, arrested, detained and denied medical treatment, resulting in her death on 14 March 2014. In a right of reply exercised during the thirtieth session of the Human Rights Council, the Chinese representative stated that Ms. Cao was “by no means a human rights defender”, but had been placed under investigation in September 2013 due to allegations of creating trouble. She had died of organ failure caused by tuberculosis, even though she had received good medical care and attempts had been made to save her. Furthermore, the case was not an issue of human rights but rather of the rule of law and the judicial sovereignty and independence of China. The organs of State would deal with any person engaged in criminal activities in accordance with the law. 8
- Followup Trends 1
- No substantive information provided by SG report
- Did the government respond? 1
- Yes
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 2
- 2019
- Follow up information provided in SG report 2
The case of Ms. Cao Shunli was included in the 2018 (A/HRC/39/41, Annex I, para.10–11), 2016 (A/HRC/33/19, para. 39), 2015 (A/HRC/30/29, Annex, para. 1), and 2014 (A/HRC/27/38, paras. 17–19) reports of the Secretary-General. On 14 March 2019, nine special procedures mandate holders issued a statement 114 renewing their call for a comprehensive and independent investigation five years after the death of Ms. Cao Shunli, a human rights defender who died in custody on 14 March 2014 following attempted engagement with the UPR. 115 They called for an investigation in 2014 116 after Ms. Cao Shunli was arrested in September 2013 at Beijing International Airport (CHN 11/2013), when her whereabouts remained unknown for five weeks until she resurfaced in custody and was charged with “provocation.” On 24 January 2014, the Government noted that she had been detained on the criminal charge of disturbing public, social and administrative order and a warrant for Cao’s arrest was issued on the charge of the crime of provocation. 117 During her incarceration, Ms. Cao Shunli’s health seriously deteriorated, allegedly due to torture, ill-treatment, and authorities’ failure to provide her access to medical care, and she died weeks after being admitted to hospital in critical condition on 19 February 2014 (CHN 13/2013). [...] 28. On 1 July 2019, the Government responded to the allegations above. Regarding the case of Ms. Cao Shunli, the Government indicated that judicial organs handled the case in accordance with the law, and guaranteed her legal rights. She died of illness on 14 March 2014.
- Followup Trends 2
- Stayed same
- Date of follow up 2
- 14 March 2019
- Did the government respond? 2
- Yes
- Was this case followed up by a UN body? 2
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 3
- 2023
- Follow up information provided in SG report 3
- The case of lawyer Ms. Wang Yu has been included in the reports of the SecretaryGeneral since 201853 on allegations of arrest and charges of “subversion of state power,” (CHN 6/2015),54 including in connection with her role in the case of Ms. Cao Shunli, who had cooperated with the United Nations. On 26 November 2020, the Beijing Justice Bureau reportedly cancelled Ms. Wang Yu’s license to practice law. According to informationreceived by OHCHR, during the reporting period, while quarantine restrictions were still in place, her local health code reportedly turned red (indicating a COVID-19 infection) despite repeated negative COVID-19 test results, during the 20th Party Congress in October 2022. As a result of having a red health code, her movements were reportedly restricted, and she was barred from entering buildings and accessing transportation.
- Followup Trends 3
- Stayed same
- Did the government respond? 3
- No
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 4
- 2024
- Follow up information provided in SG report 4
- The case of Ms. Cao Shunli, a human rights defender who had been arrested following an attempt (or attempts) to engage in the second universal periodic review of China and who had died in custody in 2014, was included in the reports of the Secretary-General between 2014 and to 2016, and 2018.59 On 14 March 2024, on the occasion of the tenth anniversary of her death in custody, special procedures mandate holders condemned the continued failure of the Chinese authorities to investigate the circumstances surrounding the death of Ms. Cao Shunli and bring those responsible to justice. They urged Chinese authorities afresh to fully and fairly investigate the circumstances that led to Ms. Cao Shunli’s death and hold those responsible to account.60
- Regarding Ms. Cao Shunli, the Government noted that the Chinese judicial authorities had handled her case in accordance with the law, that her legitimate rights had been safeguarded in accordance with the law and that she had died on 14 March 2014, due to illness.
- Followup Trends 4
- Stayed same
- Date of follow up 4
- 14 March 2024
- Did the government respond? 4
- Yes
- Was this case followed up by a UN body? 4
- UN Special Procedures: UN Special Procedures - General