young woman human rights defender
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2025-037-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2025
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: -4.038333
Longitude: 21.758664
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- From Region
- Type of record
- Unnamed individual/group/organization
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
a young woman human rights defender who had been sharing information on developments in her locality with UNJHRO.
- Type of rights defended
- Unclear in SG Report
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
During the reporting period, UNJHRO also documented that, the M23, in the context of its rapid territorial expansion in North Kivu Province, reportedly sought to suppress reporting on human rights abuses by systematically targeting civil society activists and non-governmental organizations working on human rights, sharing information on developments in her locality with UNJHRO
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Peace Operation / Political mission
- Dates of engagement
- From April 2024
- Type of attempted engagement
- Submission of information to UN
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- June 2024 - end of November 2024
- Location of mentioned reprisals
- North Kivu, DRC
- Reprisal information
During the reporting period, UNJHRO also documented that, the M23, in the context of its rapid territorial expansion in North Kivu Province, reportedly sought to suppress reporting on human rights abuses by systematically targeting civil society activists and non-governmental organizations working on human rights, and media outlets, allegedly pressuring them to comply or face the consequences. In one instance, a young woman human rights defender who had been sharing information on developments in her locality with UNJHRO since April 2024, was targeted by theM23 in June 2024, as the rebel group intensified its presence in her hometown. Elements of the M23 allegedly attempted to coerce her into promoting their ideology, which she reportedly resisted. In response, they reportedly issued threats against her and her family, explicitly referencing her cooperation with UNJHRO. Despite the threats, the woman reportedly continued her human rights work while maintaining a low profile. Nevertheless, the threats reportedly escalated, and M23 allegedly increased surveillance of her movements. At the end of November 2024, elements of the group reportedly attempted to abduct her during a social gathering. She reportedly escaped with the assistance of neighbours and fled to another area, where she has been in hiding since.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Physical attack: Attempted kidnapping
- Family/friends/acquaintances targeted
- Surveillance
- Threats/Intimidations (incl. "fear of reprisal")
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- Non-state actor(s)
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Further case development
- During the reporting period, the United Nations Joint Human Rights Office (UNJHRO) of the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) documented seven incidents of reprisals against male (2) and female (5) civil society actors, mostly human rights defenders, including three youth, for cooperation with the Mission, described below. Four incidents were attributed to the Movement du 23 Mars (M23), two to local armed groups, and one to State actors, in different locations in conflict-affected provinces of North Kivu and Ituri Provinces. Names and details of those concerned are withheld due to fear of further reprisals.
- According to information received by OHCHR, the Mouvement du 23 Mars (M23) continued to be openly hostile towards human rights defenders and journalists whom they accused of reporting on M23’s activities, including to the United Nations. This public hostility worsened during the reporting period, when the M23 gained control of large territories, including Goma and Bukavu, the two largest cities of the Eastern provinces of North and South Kivu, and publicly banned activities of civil society actors, human rights defenders and independent media in occupied areas and systematically targeted them. The number of reported cases of reprisals for cooperation with UNJHRO and other United Nations agencies in the affected areas during the period is believed to underrepresent the actual figures. Many victims fled or went into hiding before they could report allegations of human rights violations to the United Nations, and in some instances, UNJHRO could not secure their consent for fear of further reprisals. Cases in other provinces are also likely under-reported due to a lack of communication infrastructure hindering access to victims and reporting as well as to limited awareness of what constitutes reprisals, the importance of reporting them, and how to do so.
- Was the case raised by a State at the UN?
- No
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No