Said Ali Said Jadad (2015)
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2015-034-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2015
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 21.4735329
Longitude: 55.975413
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Oman
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- Dates of prior UN action
- 11 November 2014; 16 December 2014; 29 January 2015; 30 January 2015
- Type of record
- Named individual
- Gender
- Male
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
a human rights defender advocating for democratic reforms in the country
- Type of rights defended
- Civil/political rights
- Unclear in SG Report
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
After meeting with the Special Rapporteur during his above- mentioned country visit
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Special Procedures: thematic
- Dates of engagement
- between 8 and 13 September 2014
- Type of attempted engagement
- Meeting with UN officials during country visit / with locally present UN officials
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- 31 October 2014; 10 December 2014; 22 December 2014; 21 January 2015
- Location of mentioned reprisals
- Salalah
- Reprisal information
Mr. Jadad was reportedly subjected to greater surveillance. On 31 October 2014, while on his way to board a flight to Istanbul to attend a workshop for human rights defenders, Mr. Jadad was stopped, his passport confiscated and informed of a travel ban issued against him by border control officers at Muscat International Airport. On 10 December, members of the Oman Royal Police and the Internal Security Forces reportedly arrested Mr. Jadad at his house in Salalah. He was released on 22 December 2014 after his son’s passport was confiscated as a guarantee, but rearrested on 21 January 2015, reportedly on charges of, inter alia, undermining the prestige of the State (A/HRC/28/85, case OMN 3/2014, and A/HRC/29/50, cases OMN 5/2014 and OMN 1/2015)
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Family/friends/acquaintances targeted
- Surveillance
- Travel restriction
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Further case development
In a press release of 30 January 2015, mandate holders urged the Government to release Mr. Jadad and to guarantee that no human rights defender in the country would be subjected to any form of reprisal
- Government response dates
- 20 February 2015
- Government response content
In response to the second communication and the press release, on 20 February 2015, the Government rejected the allegations, explaining that Mr. Jadad had been arrested not for having met with the Special Rapporteur but because of violation of laws and regulations (A/HRC/29/50, case OMN 5/2014).
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 1
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 0
- 2016
- Follow up information provided in SG report 0
43.The case of Said Ali Said Jadad, a human rights defender advocating for democratic reforms in Oman, who had reportedly become the subject of intimidation and reprisalsafter he had met with the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association during his visit to Oman in 2014, was mentioned in my previousreport (see A/HRC/30/29, para.34). In theirobservations on communications reports to the twenty-ninth and thirty-firstsessionsof the Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteurs on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, andon the situation of human rights defenders,respectively, regretted that no response had been received to the joint communication dated 29 January 2015 and urged the Government to fully cooperate with theirmandates (see A/HRC/29/25/Add.3, para.577, and A/HRC/31/55/Add.1, para.536).At the time of finalization of the present report, no government response had been received to the above-mentioned communication.
- Followup Trends 0
- No substantive information provided by SG report
- Did the government respond? 0
- No
- Was this case followed up by a UN body? 0
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic