Individuals who cooperated with the Commission of Inquiry on Burundi
Cases- Case status
- Unknown
- Location of case in SG report
- 2021-008-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2021
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: -3.373056
Longitude: 29.918886
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Burundi
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- UN Human Rights Council: UN Independent Investigation
- Dates of prior UN action
- September 2020
- Type of record
- Unnamed individual/group/organization
- Gender
- Gender unclear
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
Individuals who cooperated with it.
- Type of rights defended
- Unclear in SG Report
- Was the victim a civil servant, member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
Cooperating with the Commission of Inquiry
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Human Rights Council: UN Independent Investigation
- Dates of engagement
- 2020
- Type of attempted engagement
- Meeting with UN officials during country visit / with locally present UN officials
- Location of mentioned reprisals
- In Burundi or in neighbouring countries (Uganda, Rwanda and Tanzania)
- Reprisal information
The Commission of Inquiry on Burundi, which had visited Uganda, Rwanda and Tanzania and also conducted an increased number of interviews remotely, stated that it “deplored that individuals who cooperated with it had to face acts of intimidation and reprisals” (A/HRC/45/32, para. 6). In its final report, the Commission condemned the climate of intimidation, threats, fear of reprisals maintained by the Government against any person, based in Burundi or in neighbouring countries, who wish to cooperate with the Commission or any other international human rights mechanism (A/HRC/45/CRP.1, para. 14). In its oral updates to the Council during the reporting period, the Commission conveyed its gratitude to the persons who provided it with information despite the risks involved.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Threats/Intimidations (incl. "fear of reprisal")
- Unclear
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Was the case raised by a State at the UN?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 0