New Generation of Human Rights Defenders Coalition
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2019-067-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2019
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 48.019573
Longitude: 66.923684
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Kazakhstan
- From Region
- Type of record
- Named organization
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
established to coordinate civil society inputs to the third cycle of the UPR of Kazakhstan
- Type of rights defended
- Unclear in SG Report
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
established to coordinate civil society inputs to the third cycle of the UPR of Kazakhstan
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Human Rights Council: UPR
- Dates of engagement
- Between 20 and 30 March 2019
- Type of attempted engagement
- Submission of information to UN
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- Between 20 and 30 March 2019; following week
- Reprisal information
In March 2019, the New Generation of Human Rights Defenders Coalition, established to coordinate civil society inputs to the third cycle of the UPR of Kazakhstan, was reportedly subject to surveillance, called for questioning related to their cooperation with the UN, and had their private channels of communication compromised. Between 20 and 30 March 2019, two National Security Service (KNB) officials reportedly called for questioning a representative of the Coalition and inquired about their activity. The two officials were privy to detailed information on the discussions of the Coalition, and specifically referred to an encrypted message exchange (through an intercepted WhatsApp chat) that the Coalition had used to coordinate input to the UPR. The questioning occurred the same week that the Coalition sent its UPR submission on Kazakhstan to the United Nations for consideration. Another member of the Coalition reported an incident of surveillance the following week.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Surveillance
- Threats/Intimidations (incl. "fear of reprisal")
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 0