Human rights advocates and indigenous peoples’ representatives
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2019-006-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2019
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 23.684994
Longitude: 90.356331
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Bangladesh
- From Region
- Type of record
- Unnamed individual/group/organization
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
human rights advocates and indigenous peoples’ representatives, in particular from the Chittagong Hill Tracts; they reported on incidents of persecution, arbitrary arrest, torture and ill-treatment, disappearances and killings in the Chittagong Hill Tracts in the first half of 2019
- Type of rights defended
- Civil/political rights
- Indigenous peoples’ rights
- Was the victim a civil servant, member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
during the 18th session of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues in New York in April 2019, where they reported on incidents of persecution, arbitrary arrest, torture and ill-treatment, disappearances and killings in the Chittagong Hill Tracts in the first half of 2019.
- Engagement with UN body
- UN General Assembly: Forum on indigenous issues
- Dates of engagement
- April 2019
- Type of attempted engagement
- Participation in meeting on UN premises
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- April 2019
- Location of mentioned reprisals
- New York
- Reprisal information
Participants were followed and privately videotaped without their consent, and were approached and asked not to take the floor in public meetings.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Surveillance
- Threats/Intimidations (incl. "fear of reprisal")
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Further case development
some participants avoided speaking with United Nations officials out of fear of reprisals.
- Government response dates
- 5 July 2019
- Government response content
Government responded to the allegations, expressing its dismay at the allegations reported. However, to be able to check on the authenticity of the allegations, the Government indicated that it requires more information without which allegations are incomplete, unfounded and unjustified. The Government stated that in UN meetings it is common practice to take photos or record audio/video of speakers unless prohibited or restricted for a specific event. It states that Permanent Forum events are open to all, including side events. The Government indicated that it is not aware on any incident where “indigenous participants were approached in the corridors and asked not to take the floor in public meetings.” Lastly, the Government highlighted that everyone in Bangladesh is indigenous and there are as many as 50 ethnic groups, but most of the participation at the Permanent Forum is from a single ethnic group and recommends for the Permanent Forum to be more inclusive.
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 0