Julissa Villanueva Barahona
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2020-055-001
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2020
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 15.199999
Longitude: -86.241905
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Honduras
- From Region
- Type of record
- Named individual
- Gender
- Female
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Individual's/organization's activity
from the Directorate-General of Forensic Medicine; investigation of an alleged murder in the department of Copán in June 2018
- Type of rights defended
- Accountability & impunity
- Was the victim a civil servant, member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
Ms. Villanueva has regularly cooperated with the UN in Honduras, including during the 2018 visit of the Working Group on Discrimination against Women in Practice and Law; On 19 August 2019, she engaged with the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, the interviews of which were publicized in the media
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Special Procedures: thematic
- Dates of engagement
- 2018; 19 August 2019
- Type of attempted engagement
- Meeting with UN officials during country visit / with locally present UN officials
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- 20 November 2019
- Reprisal information
On 20 November 2019, following disciplinary action by the Prosecutor’s Office, including written accusations based on her interaction with the Special Rapporteur, Ms. Villanueva was dismissed from the Directorate-General of Forensic Medicine after almost 20 years of service.
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Profession-related reprisal
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- No
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 0