Hajar Mansoor Hassan
Cases- Location of case in SG report
- 2018-003-002
- Relevant SG report
- Year of the report
- 2018
- From Country
- Country Geolocation
Latitude: 26.0667
Longitude: 50.5577
- Country Geolocation (linked Cases)
- Bahrain
- From Region
- UN body that raised the case prior to the SG report
- Assistant Secretary-General
- Dates of prior UN action
- 25 July 2017; 29 May 2018;
- Type of record
- Named individual
- Gender
- Female
- Was the victim a foreign national?
- No
- Was the victim a minor?
- No
- Type of rights defended
- Civil/political rights
- Was the victim a civil servant or member of the security forces or of the judiciary?
- No
- Reported trigger of reprisal
Ms. Hajar Mansoor Hassan faced further reprisals in her place of detention, the Isa Town Prison Center, based on the raising of her and her family’s case and conditions in the Prison Center by civil society at the Human Rights Council on 2 July 2018 and at the review of Bahrain by the Human Rights Committee from 2 to 4 July 2018.
- Engagement with UN body
- UN Treaty Bodies: HRC
- UN Human Rights Council: UN Human Rights Council - General
- Dates of engagement
- 2 July 2018; 2-4 July 2018;
- Type of attempted engagement
- Other
- Dates of mentioned reprisals
- unclear; after July 2-4 July 2018
- Location of mentioned reprisals
- Isa Town Prison Center
- Reprisal information
faced further reprisals in her place of detention based on the raising of her and her family's case and prison conditions by civil society at the HRC and UN HRCtee
- Types of reprisals suffered
- Unclear
- Alleged/likely perpetrators
- State actors
- Was the reprisal based on new legislation?
- No
- Does the report make general comment about country’s environment for engagement with UN?
- Yes
- Government response dates
- 25 June 2018;
- Government response content
On 25 June 2018 the Government responded to the allegations of travel bans that freedom of movement in Bahrain is guaranteed by law, and that Ms. Ebtesam Al-Alsaegh, Mr. Nabeel Rajab, Ms. Neda Al-Salman (see Annex II of the present report), and the family members of Mr. Al- Wadaei’s were not subject to reprisals for cooperation with the United Nations but rather responsible for criminal offenses. 5. With regard to Mr. Sayed Ahmed Al-Wadaei’s family members (Mr.Nazar Al- Wadaei, Mr. Mahmoud Marzooq Mansoor, and Ms. Hajar Mansoor Hassan), the Government stated they were faced reprisals for committing criminal offences and not because of Mr. Al-Wadaei’s cooperation with the United Nations. Regarding Mr. Nazar Al- Wadaei, according to the Government, two persons who investigated in relation to a 30- person attack on a public order patrol on 3 January 2017 confessed that Mr. Nazar Al-Wadaei was involved. The Office of the Prosecutor referred the case to the court, and Mr. Al- Wadaei was sentenced to seven years in prison. The decision is awaiting appeal at the Supreme Appeal Court, to resume on 5 June 2018. 6. Regarding Mr. Nazar Al-Wadaei, Mr. Mahmoud Marzooq Mansoor and Ms. Hajar Mansoor Hassan, according to the Government they were arrested for planting explosives in public places on 28 January 2017 and confessed to committing the act. Regarding Mr. Nazar Al-Wadaei and Mr. Younes Abdel Aziz, they were arrested for planting explosives in public places on 8 March 2017. According to the Government, Mr. Nazar confessed that he was instructed by Mr. Younes to commit the act. On 29 November 2017, Mr. Al-Wadaei and Mr. Abdel Aziz received a three-year prison sentence. On 8 February 2018, the Appeal Court accepted the case on a procedural basis, and the session took place on 13 June 2018. Regarding Ms. Duaa Al-Wadaei, the Government stated that she was not arrested because of her husband’s activities, but arrested and charged with insulting a public servant. According to the Government, when Ms. Al-Wadaei was leaving the country, when the passport officer asked for her boarding pass she threw her boarding pass in a provocative manner and spoke to the officer in a demeaning manner. On 21 March 2018, the Court sentenced Ms. Al-Wadaei in absentia to two months of imprisonment.
- Is the country cited for a "pattern of reprisal" in the context of this case?
- No
- Is a pattern of reprisals mentioned otherwise in the context of this case?
- No
- Does the report cite "self-censorship" as an issue in the context of this case?
- No
- How many times has the case been followed up in subsequent SG reports?
- 2
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 0
- 2019
- Follow up information provided in SG report 0
The 2018 report of the Secretary-General included references by multiple United Nations actors to a general context of harassment and intimidation against Bahraini civil society representatives seeking to cooperate with the United Nations (A/HRC/39/41 paras. 29–30). Those individuals included Mr. Sayed Ahmed Al-Wadaei and some of his close relatives, Ms. Ebtesam Abdulhusain Ali-Alsaegh, and Mr. Nabeel Rajab (A/HRC/39/41, Annex I, paras. 1–6; Annex II, paras. 4–11). [...] 3. Mr. Sayed Ahmed Al-Wadaei reportedly continues to suffer disparaging public statements in pro-Government media. The deterioration of the detention and health conditions of his mother-in-law, Ms. Hajar Mansoor Hassan, and her two cellmates at Isa Town Women’s detention Centre, Ms. Medina Ali and Ms. Najah Yusuf, have been reported. On 19 January 2019, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found the detention of Mr. Al-Wadaei’s relatives, Mr. Mahmood Marzooq Mansoor and Ms. Hassan, to be arbitrary and in reprisal for their family ties with him (A/HRC/WGAD/2018/51, para. 85, 93). 106 The Opinion was reported in the media and the Ministry of Interior publicly referred to Mr. Al-Wadaei as a “terrorist fugitive” and a “criminal,” and to his family members as “terrorists.” 4. On 17 January 2019, five special procedures mandate holders addressed allegations concerning Ms. Ali-Alsaegh and Ms. Hassan (BHR 7/2018; A/HRC/36/31, Annex I, paras. 5, 7; A/HRC/40/60, para. 75). Concerns about Ms. Ali-Alsaegh were in relation to threats, travel restrictions and criminal charges for her cooperation with the United Nations, including the Human Rights Council. During the 38th session of the Human Rights Council, after Ms. Ali-Alsaegh posted several tweets highlighting human rights concerns in Bahrain, she received messages through Twitter and Instagram urging her to close her accounts and to stop her human rights work, under threat of public defamation and rape. Her situation was addressed by special procedures in 2016 and 2017 (BHR 9/2017; 107 BHR 8/2017; 108 BHR 4/2016 109 ). 5. The mandate holders also raised concerns about further acts of reprisals, including physical abuse in detention, against Ms. Hassan, convicted under a counter-terrorism law. On 16 September 2018, Ms. Hassan was reportedly assaulted, harshly beaten, hospitalized, and then held incommunicado in Isa Town Prison from 16 to 23 September 2018. Around those dates, the 2018 report of the Secretary-General, which mentioned her case, was resented at the 39th session of the Human Rights Council (A/HRC/39/41, Annex I, para. 5). 6. The family of Ms. Hassan has reportedly not seen her since September 2018 and in January 2019, she went on a two-day hunger strike to protest the restrictions after the publication of the Opinion of the Working Group. Reports also indicate that Ms. Hassan is being denied access to adequate medical care, in particular since August 2018 when she developed medical conditions that require specialized treatment. On 20 March 2019, the Embassy of Bahrain in London, through its Twitter account, posted private correspondence between Mr. Al-Wadaei and the Ombudsman Office of the Ministry of Interior of Bahrain, including information on the situation of his mother-in-law and private email accounts of relatives. The tweets were later deleted. 7. On 11 March 2019, the Government responded providing detailed information about the situation of Ms. Ali-Alsaegh and Ms. Hassan, including related to the claims submitted to the Ombudsman Office. It stated that allegations about retaliation against individuals or family members for their human rights activities are not true. 110 [...] 9. The Government in its reply of 19 June 2019 refers to the cases of Ms. Ali-Alsaegh, Ms. Hassan, and Mr. Rajab. In the case of Ms. Ali-Alsaegh, it provides detailed information and indicated that she was prevented from travelling due to charges against her for “unauthorized demonstration.” Regarding the situation of Ms. Mansoor Hassan, the Government indicated that she was arrested in March 2017 on the charge of having taken part in placing an object resembling an explosive in a public roadway for the purpose of terrorism. According to the Government, over the course of interrogation, some of Ms. Hassan’s fellow suspects confessed to having made an imitation explosive and planting it near a farm. On 30 October 2017, Ms. Hassan was sentenced to a three-year prison term. Concerning allegations of torture, the Government indicated that no complaint has been lodged by Ms. Hassan through any of the national remedies, nor has she complained about not receiving medical treatment.
- Followup Trends 0
- Deterioration/further reprisals
- Did the government respond? 0
- Yes
- Was this case followed up by a UN body? 0
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic
- In which SG report was this case followed up on? 1
- 2020
- Follow up information provided in SG report 1
The case of Ms. Hajar Mansoor Hasan was included in the 2018 and 2019 reports of the Secretary-General on allegations of arbitrary detention and abuse due to her family ties with Mr. Sayed Ahmed Al-Wadaei (A/HRC/39/41, Annex I, para. 5; A/HRC/42/30, Annex II, paras. 3–6). The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found the detention of Mr. Al-Wadaei’s relatives, including that of Ms. Mansoor Hasan, to be arbitrary and in reprisal for his cooperation with the UN and based on their family ties with him (WGAD/2018/51, paras. 85, 93 and 96). The case of Ms. Medina Ali, at the time Ms. Mansoor Hasan’s cellmate, was also included in the 2019 report of the Secretary-General (A/HRC/42/30, Annex II, para. 3). 2. On 1 November 2019, special procedures mandate holders addressed the continued imprisonment and abuse against Ms. Mansoor Hasan and Ms. Ali (BHR 3/2019). In mid- September 2019, both women were reportedly denied the right to participate in the commemorative Ashura rites with the other inmates, and their requests for Ashura books were rejected. Mandate holders noted that around those dates, the 2019 report of the Secretary-General (A/HRC/42/30) was made public and discussed at the 42nd session of the Human Rights Council. 3. Mandate holders also raised concern about further targeting after the cases of Ms. Mansoor Hasan and Ms. Ali were discussed at an NGO side event on the margins of the Council in September 2019, broadcast online by the organisers, and a report including their cases was launched on the situation of female political prisoners in Bahrain. The National Institution for Human Rights (NIHR) issued a statement denying the allegations and, around those dates, Ms. Mansoor Hasan and Ms. Ali were barred from communicating with other inmates who were threatened with punishment if they attempted communication (BHR 3/2019). 4. On 29 December 2019, the Government 1 noted that the General Directorate of Reform and Rehabilitation allows all inmates to fulfil their religious obligations, as long as they do not undermine security and order and that they follow the rules governing such practices. The Government stated that oversight mechanisms undertake regular and periodic visits to detention centers. On 15 December 2019, under Act No. 18 of 2017 on alternative penalties and measures, a judge approved the release from prison of Ms. Ali on 16 December 2019. On 5 March 2020, Ms. Mansoor Hasan was released after the completion of her sentence.
On 9 July 2020, the Government responded to the note verbale sent in connection with the present report affirming information on the charges and sentencing of individual cases. In particular it noted the release of Ms. Mansoor Hasan at the completion of her sentence. The Government affirmed the independence and integrity of the NIHR, stating that the alleged threats against Ms. Medina Ali are false. It highlighted the role of correctional and rehabilitation centres and the various national redress mechanisms, and affirmed the rights of those in detention to religious rituals.
- Followup Trends 1
- Significant positive and negative developments
- Date of follow up 1
- 1 November 2019
- Did the government respond? 1
- Yes
- Was this case followed up by a UN body? 1
- UN Special Procedures: Thematic